Get the weekly hi-fi digest — new gear, best reads, and deals.

Spotify challenges Apple's App Store fees, accusing it of blocking fair competition and violating EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Apple faces criticism for delaying DMA compliance, with potential fines reaching 10% of annual revenue.
Spotify pushes for alternative app stores to enhance competition, while Apple cites security risks as a counterargument.
Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has intensified the ongoing dispute with Apple over App Store policies, highlighting significant concerns regarding Apple’s handling of EU regulations. At the heart of the contention lies Apple’s commission structure in the App Store, which imposes up to a 30% fee on in-app purchases. This practice has restricted Spotify from offering subscriptions directly through Apple’s storefront, compelling users to subscribe via alternative methods. Recently, Spotify secured a legal victory allowing the platform to inform users about other subscription options, yet Ek remains unsatisfied, accusing Apple of deliberately evading compliance with the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Ek elaborated in an interview with Bloomberg that Apple is employing delays and excuses to postpone adherence to the DMA, which designates it as a gatekeeper due to its substantial influence over the iOS ecosystem. This designation obligates Apple to follow stricter regulations to ensure fair competition. Spotify argues that Apple’s strategies are a recurring pattern aimed at maintaining its market dominance, and Ek calls on the EU to enforce the DMA rigorously to prevent such evasive maneuvers. The potential penalties for Apple, should it violate the DMA, include fines up to ten percent of its annual revenue, adding significant pressure on the tech giant.
The conflict extends beyond mere financial disputes, touching on broader issues of consumer choice and market innovation. Spotify advocates for the introduction of alternative app stores on Apple devices, emphasizing that this would foster a more competitive environment and provide users with greater flexibility. In contrast, Apple maintains that allowing multiple app stores could pose security risks and undermine the integrity of its platform. This debate highlights the tension between regulatory efforts to curb the power of major tech companies and the companies’ own strategies to protect their business models and revenue streams.
As the EU’s competition commissioner, Teresa Ribera, works towards a decision expected by March 2025, the tech industry watches closely. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how digital marketplaces are regulated globally, influencing not only Spotify and Apple but also other major players like Google. Meanwhile, Spotify continues to strengthen its market position, supported by rising stock values and industry backing, positioning itself as a formidable challenger against Apple’s entrenched ecosystem.
This ongoing saga underscores the broader challenges faced by innovators in a landscape increasingly dominated by a few powerful gatekeepers. The resolution of Spotify’s battle with Apple will likely have lasting implications for regulatory policies, market competition, and the future dynamics of digital service providers worldwide.
New gear, best reads, and deals — every Friday.

* Queen will release a 5CD+2LP super deluxe Queen II box set on 27 March 2026 via EMI, expanding the original 1974 album extensively.

* Audio Research I/55 is a compact tube integrated amplifier derived from I/70, succeeding I/50, targeting high-end listeners seeking classic tube sound with m…

* ToxFreeLife tested 81 headphone models from brands including Sony, Apple, JBL, Bose, Samsung, and Temu across European retail and online marketplaces.

* Audio-Technica launches the ATH-CKD7NC USB-C wired earphones on February 27, featuring hybrid noise cancelling and priced at ¥9,680 via direct sales.